Financial markets remained shuttered on New Year’s Day as traders worldwide took the day off to recover from holiday celebrations, but the positioning and momentum built throughout 2025’s final trading sessions create compelling arguments for commodities exposure as 2026 begins. While U.S. equity markets do not operate on January 1 each year and there was no regular trading session for stocks or exchange-traded funds, the extraordinary 2025 performance of precious metals, industrial commodities, and materials-focused ETFs has established powerful trends that appear poised to continue into the new year. The dramatic outperformance of commodity assets relative to traditional equities throughout 2025 reflects fundamental supply-demand imbalances that show no signs of resolving, creating conditions where savvy investors can position portfolios to benefit from structural tailwinds rather than fighting the tape by chasing overvalued technology stocks.
Gold and silver enjoyed standout years in 2025, with both metals surging to all-time highs as investors sought safety amid monetary policy uncertainty and geopolitical tensions. Gold’s 64% annual advance represents its largest yearly gain since 1979, while silver’s 141% surge shattered records and exceeded even the most bullish forecasts circulating at the beginning of the year. The extraordinary returns delivered by precious metals came during a period when traditional safe-haven assets like Treasury bonds struggled, highlighting how inflation concerns and currency debasement fears have fundamentally altered portfolio construction considerations. Copper reached record levels amid supply chain disruptions and tariff-related uncertainty, while industrial usage drove platinum and palladium to multi-year highs throughout 2025.
The iShares Silver Trust, trading under ticker SLV, provides direct exposure to physical silver bullion and stands as one of the most compelling ETF opportunities heading into 2026. China, the world’s third-largest silver mining country, is expected to restrict exports starting in January according to reports, adding to supply constraints in an already tight market that has seen explosive demand from the red-hot artificial intelligence industry. The physical silver market experienced a historic short squeeze in October 2025 that created severe dislocations across major trading hubs, with significant amounts of available silver remaining concentrated in New York as traders await the outcome of a U.S. Commerce Department investigation that could lead to tariffs or trade restrictions.
London vaults have seen substantial inflows attempting to meet physical delivery demands, but much of the world’s silver inventory remains tied up in positions where paper claims far exceed available physical metal. The structural supply-demand imbalance creates conditions where even modest additional demand from industrial users or investment vehicles can drive prices substantially higher, as dealers scramble to cover paper positions with actual silver at a time when physical supply remains constrained. Silver’s essential role in solar panel manufacturing, 5G infrastructure, electric vehicle production, and data center construction creates secular growth drivers that extend far beyond traditional jewelry and investment demand, positioning the metal as a critical input for the clean energy transition and digital economy buildout.
Goldman Sachs raised its copper price forecast for the first half of 2026 to an average of $10,710 per ton from $10,415 previously, citing supply constraints and increasing demand from renewable energy projects and data center construction. The amount of copper used in data centers globally could grow sixfold by 2050 from about half a million tonnes today, creating a structural demand story that extends far beyond typical economic cycles. The United States Copper ETF, ticker CPER, provides exposure to copper futures and offers investors a way to participate in the red metal’s long-term growth potential without taking physical delivery or managing commodity accounts.
The artificial intelligence boom has created unprecedented demand for electricity infrastructure, cooling systems, and electronic components, all of which require substantial copper inputs. A single large data center can consume as much electricity as a small city, necessitating massive investments in power generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure that all depend heavily on copper’s superior conductivity properties. The electric vehicle transition compounds this demand pressure, as EVs contain roughly four times as much copper as internal combustion vehicles, while charging infrastructure adds additional copper requirements for every EV sold. Supply growth has struggled to keep pace with this surging demand, as new copper mines take a decade or longer to develop and face increasingly stringent environmental regulations and community opposition in many jurisdictions.
Platinum and palladium enjoyed extraordinary 2025 performances, with platinum surging 172% and palladium gaining 124% as industrial usage outpaced available supply and investment demand surged. The GraniteShares Platinum Trust, ticker PLTM, and abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF, ticker PALL, provide investors with physically-backed exposure to these metals without the complications of storage and insurance. Platinum’s role in hydrogen fuel cell technology has attracted increased attention as governments worldwide promote hydrogen as a clean energy solution, while palladium remains essential for automotive catalytic converters despite the shift toward electric vehicles happening more slowly than some forecasters anticipated.
The concentration of platinum and palladium production in just a handful of countries, primarily South Africa and Russia, creates supply risk that has historically driven price volatility during periods of geopolitical tension or labor unrest. South African mining operations face chronic electricity shortages, aging infrastructure, and periodic strikes that can rapidly tighten already constrained markets. Russian supply faces sanctions risk that could intensify if geopolitical tensions escalate, potentially removing significant production from global markets and forcing buyers to compete for limited alternative sources. These supply concentration risks create asymmetric upside for platinum and palladium prices, where disruptions can send prices soaring while downside remains somewhat protected by production costs that limit how far prices can sustainably fall.
Broader commodity exposure through diversified ETFs offers another approach for investors seeking to participate in the commodity supercycle without making concentrated bets on individual metals. The Bloomberg Commodity Index tracks a diversified basket of 24 commodity futures across energy, agriculture, and metals sectors, providing balanced exposure that smooths out volatility relative to single-commodity positions. ETFs tracking this index or similar broad commodity benchmarks delivered solid returns throughout 2025 as the entire commodity complex benefited from supply constraints, robust demand, and inflation hedging flows.
The fundamental case for commodity exposure heading into 2026 rests on multiple converging factors that show no signs of abating. Global fiscal stimulus continues to flow into infrastructure projects that consume massive amounts of raw materials, from roads and bridges to renewable energy installations and electric grid upgrades. Central banks worldwide have printed unprecedented amounts of currency over the past several years, creating conditions where hard assets that cannot be arbitrarily expanded maintain purchasing power better than paper currencies. The green energy transition requires enormous quantities of copper, silver, lithium, nickel, and rare earth elements, creating structural demand that will persist for decades regardless of economic cycles.
Geopolitical fragmentation and deglobalization trends are reshaping commodity supply chains in ways that favor higher prices and increased volatility. The post-Cold War era of globally integrated supply chains and just-in-time inventory management is giving way to regionalized production, strategic stockpiling, and redundant capacity that all require more total commodity inputs even if final demand remains constant. Trade tensions between major economies have accelerated this shift, with countries increasingly willing to sacrifice economic efficiency for supply security in critical materials. This fragmentation creates structural inefficiencies that translate into higher commodity prices as the world maintains duplicate capacity and transportation becomes less optimized.
The energy transition creates particularly acute commodity bottlenecks because renewable energy systems and electric vehicles are far more commodity-intensive than the fossil fuel infrastructure they replace. A single wind turbine requires roughly 200 times as much copper as a natural gas power plant of equivalent capacity, while solar panels demand silver, silicon, and rare earth elements in quantities that strain existing supply chains. Battery production for EVs and grid storage consumes lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite at scales that would require massive expansion of mining capacity even if no other demand growth occurred. These supply challenges mean that even aggressive mining investment and exploration would struggle to meet demand growth from the energy transition alone, creating multi-year if not multi-decade tailwinds for commodity prices.
For investors seeking to implement ETF strategies around commodity exposure, several considerations merit attention beyond simply buying the highest-flying metals. Diversification across multiple commodities reduces concentration risk while maintaining exposure to the overall commodity supercycle thesis. Combining precious metals exposure through gold and silver ETFs with industrial metals like copper and platinum provides balance between monetary debasement hedges and growth-sensitive cyclical positioning. Adding energy commodities through oil and natural gas ETFs or agriculture exposure through grain and soft commodity funds creates further diversification while capturing different supply-demand dynamics.
Cost structure matters significantly for commodity ETFs, particularly those holding futures contracts rather than physical metal. Contango, where futures prices exceed spot prices, creates negative roll yield as ETFs must continually sell expiring near-month contracts and buy more expensive deferred contracts. Backwardation, the opposite condition where spot prices exceed futures, generates positive roll yield but occurs less frequently in most commodity markets. Physically-backed ETFs like SLV, GLD, PLTM, and PALL avoid roll yield issues entirely by holding actual metal in vaults, though they charge annual expense ratios to cover storage and insurance costs. Investors should understand these structural differences and choose vehicles appropriate for their investment horizon and risk tolerance.
Tax treatment of commodity ETFs varies significantly depending on structure, with important implications for after-tax returns. ETFs holding physical metals like SLV are generally treated as collectibles for tax purposes, meaning long-term capital gains face a maximum 28% federal rate rather than the preferential 20% rate applied to most securities. Futures-based commodity ETFs often file as partnerships and issue K-1 forms rather than 1099s, creating additional tax preparation complexity and costs. Some commodity ETFs structure as grantor trusts or regulated investment companies to provide more favorable tax treatment, though these structures may involve tradeoffs in terms of tracking accuracy or cost. Investors should consult tax professionals to understand the implications for their specific situations before making large commodity ETF allocations.
The case for increased commodity exposure heading into 2026 contrasts sharply with the stretched valuations and narrow leadership characterizing U.S. equity markets. While the S&P 500 trades at roughly 23 times forward earnings, near the upper end of its historical range, many commodity-producing companies trade at single-digit multiples reflecting depressed sentiment and years of underinvestment. This valuation gap creates mean reversion potential where even modest rotation out of expensive technology stocks into beaten-down materials and energy names could drive substantial outperformance. Commodity prices themselves remain well below inflation-adjusted all-time highs in many cases, despite 2025’s strong performance, suggesting room for further gains if historical relationships reassert themselves.
Market positioning favors commodity appreciation as well, with speculative futures positioning in many markets remaining relatively light despite impressive recent gains. Hedge fund managers and commodity trading advisors who sat out much of 2025’s rally may feel compelled to chase performance in early 2026, providing additional buying pressure. Retail investor participation in commodity ETFs remains modest relative to the flows pouring into equity and cryptocurrency funds, suggesting that broader commodity exposure remains an uncrowded trade with room for substantial inflows if momentum continues. Central bank gold purchases from emerging market monetary authorities show no signs of slowing, providing steady incremental demand that supports prices even during periods when investment demand wanes.
For those seeking to automate commodity ETF trading strategies to capitalize on technical signals and momentum, TradersPost enables automated trading bots for stocks, crypto, options, and futures, integrating seamlessly with strategies from TradingView and TrendSpider. Execute trades effortlessly across top brokers like Tradovate, TradeStation, Coinbase, Interactive Brokers, and Alpaca. Redpulse readers can use code REDPULSE for 20% off at TradersPost.
The solar energy sector’s resurgence creates another compelling ETF opportunity for 2026, with clean energy funds like Invesco Solar ETF, ticker TAN, and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, ticker PBW, surging 48.4% and 60% respectively over the past six months through late December 2025. Solar is regaining its shine as the AI-driven power boom lifts demand for cheap, reliable energy to power data centers and other electricity-intensive applications. Costs for photovoltaic panels have fallen sharply over the last decade according to the International Renewable Energy Agency, while battery storage prices are also declining, making solar energy increasingly cost-competitive with fossil fuel alternatives even without subsidies.
Apart from falling panel and battery costs, easing policy fears and attractive valuations have sparked the sharp rebound in solar and clean energy ETFs after years of underperformance. The Trump administration’s mixed signals on renewable energy policy created uncertainty throughout much of 2025, but the practical reality that power-hungry AI companies and data center operators need massive amounts of electricity from any available source has driven continued solar capacity additions regardless of policy environment. The combination of improved economics, structural electricity demand growth, and beaten-down valuations creates conditions where solar ETFs could continue rallying even if broader equity markets struggle.
International market ETFs also merit consideration for investors seeking to diversify away from expensive U.S. stocks while maintaining equity exposure. International markets quietly outshone Wall Street during portions of 2025 as tech concentration risks and lofty U.S. valuations drove some sophisticated capital to cheaper developed and emerging markets. The Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF, ticker VEU, provides broad international exposure at a low 0.08% expense ratio, giving investors access to thousands of companies outside America without country-specific concentration risk. Valuations in many international markets remain far more attractive than U.S. equivalents, with the MSCI Emerging Markets Index trading at approximately 11 times forward earnings versus 23 times for the S&P 500.
As 2026 trading prepares to resume, the New Year’s Day market closure provided investors with time to reassess portfolio allocations and consider whether positioning appropriately reflects the macroeconomic environment and relative valuations across asset classes. The extraordinary commodity performance of 2025, particularly in precious metals and industrial materials, reflects fundamental supply-demand imbalances that appear likely to persist if not intensify during 2026. China’s impending silver export restrictions, copper’s critical role in the AI infrastructure buildout, and platinum and palladium supply concentration risks all point toward continued strength in metals prices that should flow through to ETFs providing commodity exposure.
The structural drivers supporting commodity demand, from the energy transition to deglobalization to monetary debasement concerns, operate on multi-year if not multi-decade timeframes rather than representing temporary factors that could quickly reverse. This creates conditions where tactical traders and long-term investors alike can find compelling opportunities in commodity ETFs, though the specific vehicles and strategies will differ based on individual circumstances and objectives. Whether through direct metal exposure via physically-backed ETFs like SLV and PLTM, industrial metal plays through CPER, or diversified approaches using broad commodity index funds, investors have numerous tools available to gain commodity exposure appropriate to their risk tolerance and investment horizon.
The coming year promises continued volatility across all asset classes as central banks navigate the tension between inflation concerns and economic growth imperatives, geopolitical risks simmer or escalate, and technological transformations driven by AI reshape entire industries and infrastructure requirements. In this environment, maintaining diversified exposure across multiple asset classes and regions makes sense even for investors with strong convictions about specific themes. Commodity ETFs provide one avenue for achieving this diversification while positioning portfolios to benefit from structural tailwinds that should prove more durable than the narrow leadership and stretched valuations characterizing current equity markets. Whether 2026 proves to be commodities’ year or merely another chapter in a longer supercycle, the setup heading into January certainly favors those with meaningful exposure to the physical assets that power modern civilization.
